Words are to actions what pictures of people are to people. They don’t communicate very much in and of themselves–context is critical. And even with context, interpreting meaning is an entire other matter requiring a lot more evidence than more language alone can capably produce. It requires experience. It requires action.
Religion is all about telling others what to do–for were it ever actually about personal enlightenment, two things: 1) after a few thousand years of it, you’d expect a few more enlightened folks, 2) enlightened people don’t preach.
Western religion is much more about looking for answers in the book rather than outside of it, where more enlightened people live and work–people who’ve come to peace with the uncertainty itself rather than devoting themselves to the delusional belief that there is certainty in the world despite unlimited evidence to the contrary.
The proof that religion doesn’t work is that it has no predictive value. The proof that it has no predictive value is that nobody ever gets all they want–and the more ambitious they are in life, religious or not, the further they felt away from it. The it isn’t happiness–everyone knows that’s temporary and comes off of a personal success, but it abates. To goal of enlightenment is peace. The irony, however, is that peace is in all of our futures whether we pursue it or not. But having it in our lives is another matter. So even if you’ll never make it there (before you’re taken there), the journey is rich with rewards–but you won’t be able to see them or even consider them only reading about it or having it told to you. Those you can only discover on your own.
Even if there were a creator, evidence (itself) only exists within the creation itself. Not in language–a tool far too crude and imperfect to ever transmit such a thing. We’re lucky enough if we can communicate what we want on our sandwiches.